Public consultation on the draft guidelines for information exchange in the context of dual distribution

20/04/2022

As a reminder, “dual distribution” refers to the scenario where a supplier sells goods or services not only, at the upstream level, through independent distributors, but also at the downstream level, directly to end customers, thus competing with its independent distributors.

The revised draft of the Vertical Agreements Exemption Regulation No. 330/2010 published on July 9, 2021 proposed to limit the safe harbor for dual distribution, by introducing several conditions allowing this vertical agreement to benefit from the block exemption, with the exception of the exchanges of information between the parties which will be assessed under the rules applicable to horizontal agreements.

Comments received by the European Commission (hereinafter the “Commission”) during an initial consultation, which took place between July and September 2021, highlighted the lack of guidance on the types of information that can be exchanged between a supplier and a buyer in a dual distribution scenario.

On February 4, the Commission invited stakeholders to comment on guidance on information exchange in the context of dual distribution, which is intended to be added to the vertical guidelines[1].

The draft now provides that the exemption will apply to all aspects of the vertical agreement in question, “including any exchange of information between the parties that is necessary to improve the parties’ production or distribution of the contract goods or services.”

According to the Commission, the assessment of whether the exchange of information is necessary to improve production or distribution may depend on the type of distribution network in which the parties are involved and provides in any event a non-exhaustive list of information that qualifies for exemption (e.g. technical information, supply information, recommended prices) and conversely those that are generally excluded and will have to be assessed individually under the rules applicable to horizontal agreements.

The Commission’s clarification of the exchange of information in the context of dual distribution is obviously to be welcomed, but it does not provide all the legal certainty expected insofar as the “non-exhaustive” list of clauses established leaves the door open to a certain unpredictability.

It is also curious that certain information is included in the list of information that can benefit from the exemption, in particular that relating to recommended resale prices, insofar as this could obviously increase the risks of collusion within a distribution network.

UGGC - Michel ponsard 063 sachaheron 2
UGGC - Ophelie somme

[1]Draft new section dealing with information exchange in dual distribution”, published on February 4th, 2022.

First "gun jumping" decision by the Moroccan Competition Council!

Antitrust, Distribution and Consumption
05/05/2022 First "gun jumping" decision delivered by the Moroccan Competition Council! By decision of April 28, 2022, the Competition Council decided to impose a financial penalty of 11,670,215 dirhams (i.e.…

Note on a decision of the Court of Cassation on the question of the seizability of documents related to a lawyer's consultation in the context of a competition investigation on the premises of a company.

Antitrust, Distribution and Consumption
In an interesting decision of 26 January 2022, the Court of Cassation (Cass. crim. 26-1-2022 n° 17-87.359 F-D) clarifies the question of the seizability of documents related to a lawyer's…

“Egalim II” Law: What's new on logistics penalties between suppliers and distributors?

Antitrust, Distribution and Consumption
The “Egalim II” Law of October 18th, 2021 introduces several new provisions on logistics penalties into the French Commercial Code. These new provisions came into force on October 20th, 2021…