The real estate advertisements of the website are a protected data base


In a decision dated February 2, 2021, the Paris Court of Appeals confirmed that the website qualified as a database of which LBC, the operator, is the producer. The decision, handed down against its competitor,, clarifies the French position on the sui generis regime for database producers.

At the origin of the litigation, the systematic extraction, by, of the data contained in the real estate database of the website Several users of this website complained about it.

In 2017, the LBC company thus summoned its competitor in order to put an end to these practices, on the basis of the sui generis right of database producers, contained in articles L. 341-1 and L. 342-2 of the French intellectual property code.

On 1st September 2017, the Paris High Court condemned, retaining the qualification of database within the meaning of L. 112-3 of the French intellectual property code for the site To do so, the court followed the traditional method which consists in qualifying as a database producer, here LBC, who makes substantial financial, material or human investments related to the constitution, verification and presentation of the contents of the database, in accordance with the aforementioned articles.

The High Court also found an infringement of LBC’s rights as the producer of the database, but considered that the data extracted and reused were not substantial, in that (i) they constituted only 10% of the totality of the advertisements on the applicant’s website, and (ii) LBC failed to demonstrate how these data could be considered as qualitatively substantial. On those grounds, is sentenced to publication measures and to pay 20,000 euros to LBC in compensation for the damage its image.

The Court of Appeal, seized by, confirmed the qualification of database of the site and the quality of producer of the company LBC. Likewise, the decision confirmed the reparation measures decided by the High Court.

On the other hand, the Court of Appeal held that the data extracted and reused was indeed substantial in quality, considering that the data was contained in a “sub-database” of the website, namely the real estate category, and on the basis of a large series of accounting and technical documents justifying financial, material and human investments, presented by the LBC company on appeal. The Court of Appeal thus sets the financial loss of the LBC company at 50,000 euros.

By the IP/IT team of UGGC law firm

Sources :

Cannes 2022: "Transposition of the AVMS Directive", with Anne-Marie Pecoraro, Corinne Khayat and Rodolphe Boissau

After a 73rd virtual edition because of Covid-19 and a 74th edition shifted in July to be organized in person despite the pandemic, the 75th edition of the Cannes Film…

The European Commission adopts a proposal for a Data Act

Watches, thermostats, lights, cameras, TVs, robots, scales… these objects all have in common that they present versions of themselves in so-called connected object versions; and the list is not exhaustive,…

The transfer of audiovisual catalogs

The law n° 2021-1382 of October 25, 2021 relating to the regulation and protection of access to cultural works in the digital era has brought some changes that reinforce the…